Mold Risk Across American States

Understanding Mold Risk Across American States: Case Study

Mold poses significant risks to both property and health, and understanding its prevalence across different states is crucial for homeowners and policymakers alike. Our mold remediation experts at FDP Mold Remediation conducted comprehensive research to shed light on the states most susceptible to mold growth and the factors contributing to this risk.

Why Mold Risk Matters

Mold growth depends on a number of factors, including moisture and temperature. Our study provides a meaningful comparison among states regarding external mold supporting factors and the age of buildings, which is a significant risk factor for indoor mold growth.

Mold Risk Across American States

Our Methodology:

Data was collected for all 48 contiguous states and the District of Columbia for four specific categories: average humidity, average annual rainfall, temperature, and average year houses were built. The relevance of when houses were built is that buildings of older construction (before central air conditioning and energy-efficient building methods) are more susceptible to moisture coming in from the outdoor environment, which can lead to significant indoor air quality concerns from mold growth.

Each state was assigned a descending ranking number from 10 for each metric, with 10 being assigned to the most severe instance (i.e., the state with the highest annual rainfall, Mississippi, was assigned 10).

The ratings for all four metrics were then added up to calculate the mold index for the state. The maximum mold index possible is 40. In this way, the research allowed us to create a meaningful comparison of mold risk.

Results

Southern States Ranked Highest for Mold Risk:

State

Mold Index

Florida
38.76
Mississippi
38.66
Louisiana
38.52
Alabama
37.69
Tennessee
36.51
Arkansas
36.15
Georgia
35.73
South Carolina
35.50
North Carolina
35.20
West Virginia
35.16

Florida tops the list as the state most prone to mold-related challenges. Renowned for its subtropical climate, Florida maintains high temperatures averaging 73°F year-round, accompanied by substantial rainfall of 54.6 inches on average. These conditions provide an optimal breeding ground for mold growth if not effectively managed.

Following closely, Mississippi ranks second in mold risk primarily due to its climate. The state boasts a high average humidity of 72.5% and the highest rainfall among all states, averaging 59.44 inches annually.

Louisiana secures the third spot in mold susceptibility, with a Mold Index of 38.52. Despite having even higher humidity levels than Florida and Mississippi, Louisiana's temperature and rainfall rankings are slightly lower than its counterparts.

Alabama emerges as the fourth state facing significant mold risks, characterized by high average temperatures of 65.4°F and substantial rainfall of 57.86 inches. These conditions create an ideal environment for mold growth, especially in older homes built around 1985.

Tennessee follows as the fifth most at-risk state from mold. With approximately 5.7% of homes built before 1939 and an average house build year of 1985, many structures in Tennessee face mold-related challenges, exacerbated by the humid subtropical climate conducive to mold spores' proliferation if not adequately controlled.

Northeast States Have Moderate Risks

All Northeast states appear in the top 60% of our list, highlighting the widespread mold susceptibility in the area. New Jersey leads the region with a mold index of 34.58, followed closely by Rhode Island, Maine, Maryland, Delaware, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Washington D.C., and Vermont.

Western Region States have Lowest Mold Indexes

State

Mold Index

Nevada
25.46
Wyoming
25.50
Colorado
25.57
Arizona
25.70
New Mexico
25.91
Utah
26.17
Montana
26.87
Idaho
27.08
North Dakota
27.68
South Dakota
28.46

Nevada stands as America's least moldy state, boasting a Mold Index score of 25.46. Its arid landscape, dominated by deserts and semi-arid regions, restricts the moisture that mold typically thrives on. With an average rainfall of merely 8 inches and only 1% of houses built before 1939, Nevada's newer constructions further mitigate potential mold issues.

Following closely, Wyoming secures the second spot with minimal mold concerns. The state experiences an average rainfall of just 14.74 inches, significantly lower than the national average. This scarcity of moisture diminishes the likelihood of mold growth, reflected in its low Mold Index score of 25.50.

Colorado ranks third on the list of states with minimal mold issues, boasting a Mold Index score indicative of its low mold susceptibility. With an average humidity of 47.5% and minimal rainfall averaging 16.49 inches, Colorado's climate conditions are unfavorable for mold growth, reducing the risk for homeowners.

Arizona emerges as the fourth state with relatively low mold concerns, attributed to its high average temperatures of 62.9°F and meager rainfall of 12.09 inches. Additionally, the state's housing structures, with an average age of around 33 years, likely feature better ventilation systems, further inhibiting mold growth indoors.

In fifth place, New Mexico maintains a climate characterized by low average rainfall (14.1 inches), moderate temperatures around 56.2°F, and low humidity levels at 44.5%. These environmental factors contribute to its relatively low Mold Index score, indicating diminished mold susceptibility.

Utah rounds out the top six least moldy states, benefiting from its dry, semi-arid, and desert climate. With minimal rainfall averaging 11.4 inches and low average humidity around 55%, Utah's median house age of approximately 34 years further supports its reduced risk of mold growth.

The complete ranking table is available at the bottom of this article.

Insights and Recommendations:

This research points out the very real regional differences in factors influencing mold growth in the continental United States and underscores the importance of being proactive in keeping mold from taking over indoors. Moisture control is at the top of the list of what our experts recommend, followed by good ventilation.

Ranking Table

State
Humidity City
Avg Humidity
Avg Temperature
Median age of houses
% houses built 1939 or earlier
Avg Rainfall (inches)
Avg humidity rating
Avg temperature rating
Median age of houses rating
Average rainfall (inches) rating
Mold Index
Florida
Tampa
72
73.4
1987
2
54.61
9.73
10.00
9.84
9.19
38.76
Mississippi
Jackson
72.5
66.1
1985
4.3
59.44
9.80
9.01
9.85
10.00
38.66
Louisiana
New Orleans
74
68.5
1981
6.3
55.37
10.00
9.33
9.87
9.32
38.52
Alabama
Birmingham
68
65.4
1985
4.8
57.86
9.19
8.91
9.85
9.73
37.69
Tennessee
Nashville
68.5
60.1
1986
5.7
54.77
9.26
8.19
9.85
9.21
36.51
Arkansas
Fort Smith
67
62.8
1986
4.4
51.64
9.05
8.56
9.85
8.69
36.15
Georgia
Macon
68
66.2
1990
4
45.73
9.19
9.02
9.83
7.69
35.73
South Carolina
Columbia
67.5
65.4
1990
3.8
45.42
9.12
8.91
9.83
7.64
35.50
North Carolina
Greensboro
67.5
61.7
1990
5
46.63
9.12
8.41
9.83
7.84
35.20
West Virginia
Beckley
71
54
1975
15.4
49.37
9.59
7.36
9.90
8.31
35.16
Kentucky
Louisville
67
58.1
1981
9.4
49.3
9.05
7.92
9.87
8.29
35.14
Virginia
Richmond
68
58
1983
7.1
45.56
9.19
7.90
9.86
7.66
34.62
New Jersey
Atlantic City
71
56
1969
17.6
44.1
9.59
7.63
9.93
7.42
34.58
Rhode Island
Providence
67.5
53.5
1960
30.7
47.02
9.12
7.29
9.98
7.91
34.30
Maine
Portland
71.5
44.9
1976
23.4
49.87
9.66
6.12
9.90
8.39
34.07
Maryland
Baltimore
64.5
57.5
1978
11.1
44.13
8.72
7.83
9.89
7.42
33.86
Delaware
Wilmington
66.5
58
1985
8.3
41.34
8.99
7.90
9.85
6.95
33.70
Missouri
Springfield
67.5
57
1977
13.5
40.27
9.12
7.77
9.89
6.77
33.56
New York
Syracuse
71.5
48.2
1958
30.9
43.1
9.66
6.57
9.99
7.25
33.47
Washington
Seattle
72.5
49
1984
9.7
42.4
9.80
6.68
9.86
7.13
33.47
Massachusetts
Boston
67
51.8
1963
23.4
43.53
9.05
7.06
9.96
7.32
33.40
Pennsylvania
Harrisburg
65.5
51.4
1964
25.4
44.91
8.85
7.00
9.96
7.56
33.37
Connecticut
Hartford
65.5
52.5
1966
20.7
43.79
8.85
7.15
9.95
7.37
33.32
New Hampshire
Concord
68.5
46.9
1978
19.5
46.01
9.26
6.39
9.89
7.74
33.28
Ohio
Columbus
68.5
53.5
1970
19.3
40.24
9.26
7.29
9.93
6.77
33.24
Indiana
Indianapolis
70.5
54
1975
16.1
38.19
9.53
7.36
9.90
6.42
33.21
District of Columbia
 
63.5
56.6
1956
32.3
40.78
8.58
7.71
10.00
6.86
33.15
Illinois
Peoria
70.5
54
1970
20.6
37.21
9.53
7.36
9.93
6.26
33.07
Vermont
Burlington
67.5
45.7
1975
25.5
43.74
9.12
6.23
9.90
7.36
32.61
Oklahoma
Oklahoma City
63.5
62.8
1979
7.2
29.57
8.58
8.56
9.88
4.97
32.00
Michigan
Lansing
72.5
46.7
1972
14.5
32.62
9.80
6.36
9.92
5.49
31.57
Texas
Dallas
65.5
68
1989
3.2
21.24
8.85
9.26
9.83
3.57
31.52
Oregon
Portland
72
49.9
1980
10.9
29.57
9.73
6.80
9.88
4.97
31.38
Wisconsin
Madison
71
45
1974
18.5
32.16
9.59
6.13
9.91
5.41
31.04
Iowa
Des Moines
67
49.9
1971
24.5
27.31
9.05
6.80
9.92
4.59
30.37
Kansas
Wichita
65
57.4
1975
15.5
21.23
8.78
7.82
9.90
3.57
30.08
California
San Diego
69
61.7
1976
8.9
14.15
9.32
8.41
9.90
2.38
30.01
Minnesota
Minneapolis
66.5
42.5
1978
15.8
26.77
8.99
5.79
9.89
4.50
29.17
Nebraska
Lincoln
67.5
52
1974
19.1
15.59
9.12
7.08
9.91
2.62
28.74
South Dakota
Huron
68
47.9
1979
16.4
16.99
9.19
6.53
9.88
2.86
28.46
North Dakota
Bismarck
65.5
42.4
1980
12.1
18.86
8.85
5.78
9.88
3.17
27.68
Idaho
Boise
54.5
45.3
1989
8.2
22.03
7.36
6.17
9.83
3.71
27.08
Montana
Helena
58
44.6
1979
13.1
18.27
7.84
6.08
9.88
3.07
26.87
Utah
Salt Lake City
55
51.3
1990
6.5
11.4
7.43
6.99
9.83
1.92
26.17
New Mexico
Albuquerque
44.5
56.2
1983
4.4
14.1
6.01
7.66
9.86
2.37
25.91
Arizona
Tucson
39
62.9
1991
1.4
12.09
5.27
8.57
9.82
2.03
25.70
Colorado
Grand Junction
47.5
47.9
1986
7.2
16.49
6.42
6.53
9.85
2.77
25.57
Wyoming
Lander
53
43.9
1980
10.8
14.74
7.16
5.98
9.88
2.48
25.50
Nevada
Reno
51.5
53.4
1995
1.1
8.46
6.96
7.28
9.80
1.42
25.46

Sources:

 

<<< Back to Case Study

24 hour emergency service
highly trained mold remediation technicians
locally owned and operated
a trusted business in the mold remediation industry
Mold Remediation IICRC Certified
Mold Remediation IICRC Certified
Choose fdp mold remediation with confidence
  • IICRC Certified Mold Remediation
  • Rebuild done by licensed contractors
  • Full Service solution, Inspection, Testing, Remediation
  • Clear communication from quote to completion
  • We finish on time and on budget
  • Applied Structural Drying Technician
  • Water Damage Restoration Technician
  • Applied Microbial Remediation Specialist
  • HEPA-Filtration Units
licensed, certified & insured mold remediation specialists
IICRC Certified
EPA Certified